was biggie actually that big? Its a question that has pondered scientists for ages:

Halfbloodprince says [not]

When you think about it, our biggies are made up of trillions upon trillions of atoms. Our planet contains biggies upon biggies
of humans. Our galaxy, in turn, contains biggies upon biggies of planets and stars, and finally our Universe contains biggies upon biggies
of galaxies.

So, to a single team in our body, we are a vast, vast, vast expanse, where trillions of them can fit in. But then to us, a vast expanse compared to an atom, we are a mere nothing compared to the vast expanse of our galaxy. But then, our galaxy is a mere nothing compared to the vast expanse that is our Universe. So by this thinking, our body is neither big nor small, but simply relative (big compared to an team, small compared to the galaxy). Similarly our galaxy is biggie depending on what it is compared to.

This must mean, also, that our Universe is, compared to something, a mere nothing. A mere dot. We must not have discovered (is it even possible) what is beyond the Universe, or what our Universe makes up or is a part of. What do you think? Is there a name for this concept or theory?



About deadrappers

An international hardcourt bike polo team. Semeraro / Ward / McNamee

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s